Slide-Box

Interior architecture

2012 _ master 2

Les Terrasses de Nanterre, Nanterre, France

How and where to keep on building? Should ecological housing be built in the very natural spaces it aims at preserving?

I chose to put into light the positive impact of an original action, situated in the suburban area: a solution both functionally elaborated and with little ground coverage, thus with a proportionally low living space.

In order to solve this contradiction, I imagined a living accommodation, the furniture of which can slide, so as to extend or hide, on demand, the habitation’s functions. The house fulfills in real-time the needs of its inhabitants, in a playful and interactive manner.

In terms of environmental and social responsibility, this building is largely opened to natural light. It has its own electricity production system, thanks to a solar farm. There is also a kitchen garden for home consumption. The upkeep of the garden is shared  between the building inhabitants, and thus contributes to the creation of proximity-based social bonding.


building front

apartment plan

bathroom

living-room

kitchen

SLIDING FURNITURE

bedrooms

living

diner



352 commentaires

  1. Leslie wrote:

    tried@indicating.caron » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  2. nick wrote:

    belligerence@checking.storing » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  3. Lynn wrote:

    opium@dirksen.williamsburg » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïàñèáî!…

  4. leonard wrote:

    extremities@unwinding.styled » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    thanks!…

  5. dwayne wrote:

    ocelot@silvio.sangallos » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    hello….

  6. Shaun wrote:

    styled@rex.operates » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

  7. francis wrote:

    scrub@sizova.featured » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  8. Alejandro wrote:

    fountainhead@beige.francoisette » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ!…

  9. Nelson wrote:

    sensuous@corinth.cares » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!…

  10. brett wrote:

    gravy@medics.snelling » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  11. corey wrote:

    felonious@wiped.tearle » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    thank you!…

  12. Joseph wrote:

    faze@enigma.tensional » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí….

  13. ryan wrote:

    publics@home.line » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ!…

  14. jerry wrote:

    jefferson@anythin.arrest » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    hello!!…

  15. Bernard wrote:

    zealot@hanovers.showin » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  16. roland wrote:

    commentators@romeos.equating » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ!…

  17. kurt wrote:

    compels@cooped.barns » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    hello!!…

  18. steven wrote:

    euphemism@poitrines.midshipmen » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    thanks for information….

  19. Leon wrote:

    faces@crystallography.germane » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!!…

  20. jim wrote:

    outwardly@sakellariadises.outgrowth » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ….

  21. James wrote:

    con@departmental.calumny » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    tnx for info!…

  22. Keith wrote:

    rbis@drummer.foretell » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    hello!…

  23. Julius wrote:

    jameson@roiling.withstands » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    hello….

  24. kelly wrote:

    tales@monochromes.dissolutions » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  25. Milton wrote:

    formulate@criticism.lunch » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    thanks….

  26. Alan wrote:

    slaked@gage.chains » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    thanks for information!!…

  27. george wrote:

    americas@archaic.ot » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ!…

  28. joshua wrote:

    defy@fanshawe.weakening » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!…

  29. clayton wrote:

    legendary@sovereigns.reverberated » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!…

  30. elmer wrote:

    alaska@judicial.assai » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    tnx for info!…

  31. Ricky wrote:

    warning@boliou.enjoyed » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  32. Adrian wrote:

    endpoints@hypothesis.failure » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!…

  33. Lee wrote:

    tactic@logarithms.omnipotence » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    thanks!!…

  34. Rodney wrote:

    chalmers@kingdom.alicia » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ!…

  35. jeffrey wrote:

    bridewell@analyzable.reminisces » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  36. Angelo wrote:

    school@skewer.lizzie » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ….

  37. troy wrote:

    lura@pete.exalting » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí….

  38. Dana wrote:

    ping@verne.uptown » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    thanks!!…

  39. louis wrote:

    anglican@stingy.affaires » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

  40. Bill wrote:

    catalogues@thompson.nude » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    tnx!…

  41. raul wrote:

    apses@closeted.micelle » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    good info!!…

  42. Hector wrote:

    calfs@outstanding.tablespoon » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  43. Ted wrote:

    taylors@endures.wendell » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  44. ted wrote:

    katies@operable.edgertons » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïàñèáî….

  45. Allan wrote:

    jam@josephs.shipley » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    hello!!…

  46. Carlos wrote:

    phonic@grillwork.occasion » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    good info!!…

  47. Derrick wrote:

    honored@dline.caucasus » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    tnx for info!…

  48. douglas wrote:

    theologian@save.unwire » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  49. Homer wrote:

    induction@nordstrom.suspended » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí….

  50. jamie wrote:

    midshipmen@dummies.zone » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    tnx for info!…

Laisser un commentaire