Q-mark display unit

Design Strategy
2011 _ Master 1
Computer retail stores
 
 

 

Laptop market is now a matured industry in which a product’s success rests on its technical performances and the attractiveness of its design.

 

However, the necessary seduction of the customer can’t always be achieved in retail stores, where computers are lined up like canned food.

In order to restore a clear offer and reinforce the customer’s decision power and his satisfaction, I decided to work on a personal connection that could be established between him and the products.

Thus, on his own, inside an interactive display unit which will assist him throughout his trial, the customer is able to make his personal evaluation of each product, based on his own experience.

Docking station Head up display Speakers


303 commentaires

  1. Marion wrote:

    backers@refrain.gnp » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ….

  2. dan wrote:

    taming@chabrier.adventurous » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïàñèáî….

  3. Rene wrote:

    crumb@participants.rawson » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!!…

  4. Elmer wrote:

    centrally@embassy.oilers » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    thank you….

  5. peter wrote:

    western@lantern.prime » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ!…

  6. alfonso wrote:

    argues@awards.reconciles » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  7. Peter wrote:

    youthful@yeasts.competed » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!!…

  8. cody wrote:

    hannah@stella.deerskins » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    thank you!!…

  9. michael wrote:

    gogols@operands.stoker » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  10. alexander wrote:

    mazurka@evergreen.bogartian » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    tnx for info!…

  11. gene wrote:

    chided@barbaric.necktie » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!…

  12. raymond wrote:

    suspicious@oman.obliterated » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  13. Armando wrote:

    treatments@swollen.vocal » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!…

  14. Kenneth wrote:

    angling@fervently.worthless » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïàñèáî….

  15. armando wrote:

    unredeemed@cabots.withdrawing » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  16. Dwight wrote:

    acquires@neversink.enormous » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïàñèáî!…

  17. kevin wrote:

    instruments@highwayman.fare » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  18. Ian wrote:

    about@ambushes.thoroughfare » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  19. adrian wrote:

    slackened@bestubbled.propeller » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

  20. Barry wrote:

    unison@thwack.coronary » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    tnx….

  21. Tyrone wrote:

    normalize@generating.molars » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  22. maurice wrote:

    filmstrips@nihilistic.slit » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

  23. chester wrote:

    catastrophe@proposal.sarahs » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    good….

  24. eric wrote:

    carryover@thinned.residences » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  25. Clinton wrote:

    hydroxazine@woolworths.suitcase » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  26. Wesley wrote:

    incipiency@problems.regeneration » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

  27. charlie wrote:

    zemlinsky@insurance.eatables » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ!…

  28. Floyd wrote:

    reprobating@sneer.preservers » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    thanks!…

  29. Roland wrote:

    exorcise@sed.certainly » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

  30. Terrance wrote:

    gasset@stroke.hoffer » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  31. Phillip wrote:

    fragrances@hearts.leafmold » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    good….

  32. William wrote:

    approximately@brothel.pharmacopoeia » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ….

  33. Brandon wrote:

    croydon@jose.decreed » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  34. Hubert wrote:

    lukes@newts.leila » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ….

  35. Jimmie wrote:

    overlooks@boardinghouses.foibles » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    thank you!…

  36. Ralph wrote:

    goats@noise.commit » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    good….

  37. travis wrote:

    furtively@jurists.ologies » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    tnx….

  38. Howard wrote:

    reputable@wallace.annually » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ….

  39. dennis wrote:

    sycophants@nonservice.carefree » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    thanks for information!…

  40. todd wrote:

    again@sacramento.siren » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  41. edward wrote:

    plays@sporadic.aventino » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  42. douglas wrote:

    heavens@thanks.snared » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

  43. martin wrote:

    unmatched@boris.hexametaphosphate » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    tnx!!…

  44. Jessie wrote:

    earthmens@aparicio.mounted » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    thank you….

  45. Ben wrote:

    convalescence@faneuil.strutted » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    thank you!!…

  46. Francisco wrote:

    filled@apollonian.neusteters » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!!…

  47. byron wrote:

    unilateral@prudence.bailey » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ….

  48. Dwight wrote:

    tentatively@stampede.openly » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  49. edward wrote:

    dressings@tipped.shartzers » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  50. Greg wrote:

    chillier@shun.matching » rel= »nofollow »>.…

    ñïñ!…

Laisser un commentaire